I'm going to come right out and say, I love functional programming. It is an awesome way to write programs. When I first started to learn how to write programs in a functional way, I was blown away by how concise, clear, and powerful functional solutions can be for some problems.
Rick Minerich, in his recent essay "Functional Programming is Dead, Long Live Expression-Oriented Programming", makes the point that a good functional language isn't about supporting anonymous, making it easier. Its about expressions. And I couldn't agree more.
"Functional programming" is really a loaded term. It invokes all sorts of ideas such as "purity", high-order functions, parallelization, etc. These topics are all really interesting, and exciting. However, for day-to-day programming, most of these topics are too different than the way existing systems work.
Expression-oriented programming is a good middle-ground. Everything returns a value, and can be used as a component in an expression. Each step in a computation is structured in a singular, composable way. Each component is isolated from other components, and yet can be seen in context. There is no need to give it more clout than it naturally deserves.
The truth of this point is best illustrted with Ruby. Ruby feels extremely functional. However, Ruby doesn't actually have "functions", as we think of them. And that's totally fine! Ruby's everything-as-an-expression model makes it really easy to write in a functional way.
So, I think Rick is onto something, and that the "expression-oriented" term should be adopted. It simplifies the discussion about functional programming, exposes flaws in existing languages that try to glue functional features onto themselves, and helps guide the discussion for future languages. All-in-all, a major win for programming languages.